Claude Code
Today
Explore
Practice
Library
Exam
Certificate
Search
⌘K
ខ្មែរ
◐
Sign in
Today
Explore
Practice
Library
Profile
Adversarial Review
Today
5. Optional: Delegation · 3 of 4
Mark read
Prev
Next
Orient
Fresh eyes, narrow criteria
Review a 900-line diff against its plan
Predict
Add a review step to a real workflow
Close
Practice
Related
Adversarial Review
Advanced
☆
📑
A reviewer that never saw the reasoning judges the result on its own terms
Orient
Fresh eyes, narrow criteria
Review a 900-line diff against its plan
Predict
Add a review step to a real workflow
Close
Practice
Related
Practice activities and scenarios are optional. Mark the lesson complete after reading, and return to practice whenever it helps.
Restoring your saved work…
07
Optional practice
🧠 Optional scenario practice
Q1
Why does a review in a fresh subagent context catch things the implementing session misses?
A
Subagents run on stronger models by default
B
It sees only the diff and the criteria, not the reasoning that made the change look justified
C
It has access to more of the codebase
D
It runs the tests, which the implementer does not
Q2
A reviewer returns many findings on a small, well-tested change. What is the recommended response?
A
Fix all of them — a reviewer's findings are the definition of quality
B
Tighten the criteria to correctness and stated requirements, treat the rest as optional, and re-run
C
Stop using reviewers on small changes
D
Ask the implementing session to rebut each finding
08
Up Next
Advanced
Parallel Sessions and Worktrees
Advanced
Non-Interactive Mode
Advanced
Fan-Out and Batch Work
📝 Notes
Mark lesson complete
Next: Parallel Sessions and Worktrees →