Cognitive ease — how effortlessly information is processed — gets systematically mistaken for how true or trustworthy that information is. A statement printed in a clear, high-contrast, easy-to-read font is judged more believable than the identical statement in a blurry or low-contrast font. A proverb reworded to rhyme is judged more insightful than the same proverb with the exact same meaning but no rhyme. Neither of these should logically affect truth or wisdom at all, yet both measurably do.
This is sometimes called the fluency illusion, and it compounds with a related effect — the mere exposure effect — where simply encountering something repeatedly, with no new information at all, makes it seem more familiar and therefore more likable and more credible. Together, these mean that how something is presented can carry real persuasive weight entirely independent of its actual content.
In one experiment, identical factual statements — including a false one about a historical figure's birth year — were rated as more believable when printed in a clear, high-contrast font than in a blurry, low-contrast one. In another, researchers presented unfamiliar proverbs either in their original rhyming form or reworded into non-rhyming versions with identical meaning; the rhyming versions were consistently rated as more insightful and truer, despite the content being unchanged. Separately, psychologist Robert Zajonc repeatedly exposed people to meaningless stimuli — nonsense Turkish-sounding words, Chinese-style characters — and found items shown more often were reliably rated more favorably than items shown rarely, even though participants weren't consciously aware of which items had appeared more.