Decks fail in the outline, not the design: 40 slides of everything instead of 10 slides of argument. This template turns raw material (notes, a doc, a braindump) into a presentation skeleton: one idea per slide, a headline that states the point (not the topic), three supporting bullets max, and a suggested visual — sized to the actual time slot.
The two rules that carry it: headlines are claims ('Churn is concentrated in month 2', never 'Churn overview'), and the slide count comes from the talk length, not from the material. Whatever doesn't fit the argument goes to a backup-slides list, which is where 30 of your 40 slides belonged all along.
Turn the notes below into a slide outline for a 15-minute exec update (so ~10 slides max).
AUDIENCE: CFO + VP Sales — care about efficiency and risk, hate jargon. ARGUMENT TO LAND: support costs are flat while ticket volume doubled, but month-2 churn needs a dedicated fix.
PER SLIDE:
STRUCTURE: open with the one-slide summary; end with the ask (headcount for a churn squad). Overflow → BACKUP SLIDES list with when-to-use notes. Finish with the skim test: all headlines in sequence as a paragraph — flag if the argument has a gap.
NOTES: [paste]
Below are the headlines+bullets of a 40-slide deck. The talk is now 10 minutes.
DECK: [paste]
Claude writes genuinely claim-shaped headlines when the rule is explicit and is strong at the skim-test self-check — it will honestly flag argument gaps in its own outline.